Stereotypes in Our Day Out Essay -- Our Day Out Willy Russell Stereoty

Stereotypes in Our Day OutCan Willy Russell be acc expendd of using stereotypes as a means of lay his opinions forward?Throughout the play Our Day Out, written by Willy Russell, there isa constant use of stereotypes portrayed in the characters. Stereotypesare assess characters or a fixed idea of something. WillyRussell used stereotyping as an effective way of putting his opinionsforward because he could develop his initial ideas for characters toraise knowingness of what Liverpool was like in the 1970s. In my opinionWilly Russell wanted to show the general life of many children inLiverpool in the 1970s and also to show that stereotypes earn falseviews of certain people and are harmful in general.In the textbook, the main characters are children and teachers in 1970SLiverpool. Teachers are often stereotyped anyway people presume thatthey are strict and disliked or the opposite. This contrast is shownwith the two characters Mr Briggs, who is rather strict and Mrs Kaywho is not. In t he play Mr Briggs is often shouting at the children ortelling them off Never mind what for, just do what youre told,lad. This emphasises the point that he is stern. There are no pointsin the text where Mrs Kay has this attitude directly towards thechildren.The children in the play are also stereotyped because they live in arough area and dont pay many opportunities- because of the fact thatthey live in Liverpool. In the play the children swear and steal,suggesting that they are somewhat deprived they break the law and areimpolite as they dont know any better and have been brought up in away which it is natural to do so. They are underprivileged as whenthey encounter animals at the ... ... he is very caring. I feel that Willy Russell uses stereotypesas a means of putting his opinions forward because stereotypes are sopowerful and would aim his opinions clear without directly linkingthem to him. They also make the text more understandable for thereader and intended audience.As a fi nal point, I feel that Willy Russell uses stereotypes to noonly make his opinions known but also to show that stereotypes arevery powerful and maybe make up deter people from using them as they canlimit a persons mind, if, for example a child had been told theywouldnt get a good job it may stop them from trying. Therefore WillyRussell does use stereotypes to put forward his opinions and may alsouse them to make people think carefully before they make presumptionsabout someone because of their age, race, job, wealth, beliefs or eventheir background.

I Want to be an Elementary School Teacher :: Teaching Philosophy

wherefore I Want to be an Elementary School Teacher Why do I want to become an elementary school instructor? There are so many different things I love closely teaching that it is hard to answer this question. The main reason is that I want to transfer my knowledge and ideas to children who can further the things I have taught them to become successful. umpteen teachers throughout my life have been a big inspiration to me. They have taught me many things about basic knowledge and also about life. They have make education fun and exciting. My teachers did such a good job that it actually inspired me to be a teacher myself.At a younger age, children are more apt to learn the basic skills in life. Reading habits, writing styles, and many more other things are critical to organism taught the right way at an early age. If the child is not taught how to read sentence by sentence to understand the meaning at an early age, it is rattl ing difficult for them to study later on in the future.There are many different types of students that volition be in a classroom. There will be visual learners, more hands-on type of learners, and many more. I hope to develop my classroom in a way so that I can teach all the different types of acquisition. Technology has really made this goal a large amount easier to accomplish. With the use of webpages and software, a teacher can now reinforce the different topics they cover in a classroom.Rousseau believed that children were natural innocent and with the same intelligence. I do believe that children are born with intelligence I just want to be able to expand on that. If I could just teach children how to do basic math problems, what a sentence is, or anything educational I would feel so accomplished.A classroom should also be a place for many other types of learning to take place. Students should be able to learn about social relationships, emotions, and themselves.

Arthurian Literature: The Evolution of Merlin Essay -- Literature

Arthurian Literature The Evolution of merlin In entirely the long record of literature, some false characters have loomed above others, written about again and again by various authors of various eras. Arthurian literature is one line of business of fiction that has forever and a day been popular for writers to recreate in new versions, and one of the most intriguing characters of all Arthurian literature is Merlin, the magician/ prophet who aid Arthur early in his reign. As the Arthurian saga develops, so does Merlin, changing from an aloof, druidical character into a more human, magical being, though always retaining some traces of his Welsh origins. Merlin gains his first computer address in eight ancient Welsh poems attributed to the Welsh bard Myrddin. (Bruce) Signs of his Welsh, druidical heritage are all through the verses. One poem invokes an apple-tree to cover up Merlin from his prosecute enemies, and magical apple-trees are common in Welsh fairyland. Another o f Merlins purported poems is addressed to a little pig, and in another he mentions a wolf as one of his few companions. Both of these animals are common devotional cult-objects in Welsh druidism. One poem indicates that Merlin/Myrddin spends a neat deal of his quantify with deer, perhaps even appearing in the form of a stag and living as one. This description is reminiscent of the Welsh stag-god Cernunnos, The thrust One, who appears as a man with a stags head and associates with deer. (Tolstoy) In the Welsh poem Ymddiddan Myrddin a Thaliesin (The Dialogue of Merlin and Taliesin), written down around 1050, we procure our first singularity of Merlins most prominent gift in later literature, that of prophecy. The poem ends with the lines Since I, Myrdin, am next after ... ...ne of the great and enigmatic characters of the Matter of Britain and, for that matter, of all literature. Works Cited Bruce, Dr. jam Douglas. The Evolution of Arthurian Romance. Gloucester, Mass. Peter Smith, 1958. Loomis, Roger Sherman. The Arthurian Romance. London Hutchinson & Co. Ltd., 1963. Loomis, Roger Sherman, ed. Arthurian Literature in the Middle Ages A Collaborative History. Clarendon Press, 1959. Ownbey, E. Sydnor. Merlin and Arthur A Study of Merlins fictitious character and Function in the Romances Dealing with the Early Life of Arthur. Vanderbilt University, 1932. Paton, Dr. Lucy Allen. Studies in the Fairy Mythology of Arthurian Romance. New York Burt Franklin, 1960. Tatlock, J.S.P. The Legendary History of Britain. Berkeley & Los Angeles University of California Press, 1950. Arthurian Literature The Evolution of Merlin Essay -- LiteratureArthurian Literature The Evolution of Merlin In all the long history of literature, some fictional characters have loomed above others, written about again and again by various authors of various eras. Arthurian literature is one area of fiction that has always been popular for writers to recreate in new versions, and one of the most intriguing characters of all Arthurian literature is Merlin, the magician/ prophet who aids Arthur early in his reign. As the Arthurian saga develops, so does Merlin, changing from an aloof, druidical character into a more human, magical being, though always retaining some traces of his Welsh origins. Merlin gains his first mention in eight ancient Welsh poems attributed to the Welsh bard Myrddin. (Bruce) Signs of his Welsh, druidical heritage are all through the verses. One poem invokes an apple-tree to hide Merlin from his pursuing enemies, and magical apple-trees are common in Welsh fairyland. Another of Merlins purported poems is addressed to a little pig, and in another he mentions a wolf as one of his few companions. Both of these animals are common devotional cult-objects in Welsh druidism. One poem indicates that Merlin/Myrddin spends a great deal of his time with deer, perhaps even appearing in the form of a stag and living as one. This description is reminiscent of the Welsh stag-god Cernunnos, The Horned One, who appears as a man with a stags head and associates with deer. (Tolstoy) In the Welsh poem Ymddiddan Myrddin a Thaliesin (The Dialogue of Merlin and Taliesin), written down around 1050, we receive our first indication of Merlins most prominent gift in later literature, that of prophecy. The poem ends with the lines Since I, Myrdin, am next after ... ...ne of the great and enigmatic characters of the Matter of Britain and, for that matter, of all literature. Works Cited Bruce, Dr. James Douglas. The Evolution of Arthurian Romance. Gloucester, Mass. Peter Smith, 1958. Loomis, Roger Sherman. The Arthurian Romance. London Hutchinson & Co. Ltd., 1963. Loomis, Roger Sherman, ed. Arthurian Literature in the Middle Ages A Collaborative History. Clarendon Press, 1959. Ownbey, E. Sydnor. Merlin and Arthur A Study of Merlins Character and Function in the Romances Dealing with the Early Life of Arthur. Vand erbilt University, 1932. Paton, Dr. Lucy Allen. Studies in the Fairy Mythology of Arthurian Romance. New York Burt Franklin, 1960. Tatlock, J.S.P. The Legendary History of Britain. Berkeley & Los Angeles University of California Press, 1950.

Essay --

Ever since our minds were old enough to comprehend three syllable words, weve been told to be original. Originality by definition authority the ability to think independently or creatively. Such a simple task it seems but so many of us find it extremely unvoiced to fulfill. Staying true to yourself and embracing your individuality isnt a task or concept all will grasp. To be yourself means to embrace and acknowledge that no one and only(a) else in this universe is just like you and that conforming to their standards will have to take a backseat to your happiness. Only the strong minded can do this and this revelation wont take a day or even a year, but it will embark you on a lifelong journey. To be yourself in a world that is constantly trying to make you something else is the greatest accomplishment Ralph Waldo Emerson. We live in a world where confederacy tells you to be yourself and then judges you. We applaud in a constant fear of being judged or called a weirdo. Though t he barons that hold us to this conformity are strong, many manage to suspension system through. No other person in this universe is exactly like you. Everyone has a different quality to bring to the table and that is what makes out world such a diverse place. Embracing your assets to society and not trying to imitate someone else will not only change your outlook on certain(a) situations but on your life as a whole. The phrase only the strong will survive applies to all aspects of life, including individuality. To be able to stand up for who you are and not let the opinions of the world faze you takes a strong mind and a strong spirit. Having a true sense of self is a life long journey and some people reach it more quickly than others. Some reach this place of nirvana while still in thei... ...ted. There are many countries that frown upon standing out to the extent of the Americans. In some Middle Eastern cultures, women are required to cover their bodies from distributor poi nt to toe. They dress in dark clothing so that little attention is drawn to them, if any at all. Differing from the Middle Eastern culture, American people much dress to the extreme showing them off as if the world is always watching them. Although one covers their body with a black hijab and another prances around in a rainbow dress, the one covered is not any less of an individual as the one standing out physically. In conclusion, we as a society have to realize that individuality goes much deeper than material things and that it is okay to be different. Conforming to what society feels you should do will not only be destructive to our growth as humans but as a world community as well.

Political, Social And Moral Me Essay -- essays research papers

Theodore Seuss Geisel, better known to generations of commentators all oer the world as "Dr. Seuss," is the American author of many an new(prenominal)(prenominal) popular children& adenine8217s books. Dr. Seuss&8217 "deft combination of easy words, swift rhymes and batty guff" (Horn 69) has convinced many children that reading does not bring forth to be a boring chore, but instead can be fun and entertaining. Amidst these wacky drawings of nuts characters spouting off crazy rhetoric, there is very much hidden symbolism. Many of Dr. Seuss&8217 whole kit contain political, social, and chaste messages.     Political messages in Dr. Seuss&8217 plant life include war, economic and environmental themes. Two of Dr. Seuss&8217 later whole kit and boodle, The Butter Battle Book and The Lorax, "take strong stands on the dangers of indifference to world affairs." (Horn 70) In The Butter Battle Book, Seuss takes thermonuclear war as his theme. Two groups of animals live on either side of a stone wall. One side take in their bread butter side up, while the other side eats their bread butter side down. Because of each group&8217s left(p) ways, neither side trusts the other. Each side sets up a border patrol with mild protection. Over the course of the book, the weapons get more complicated and the right way until each side invents "the bitsy big-boy boomeroo," a very mighty bomb. Each side is ready to destroy the other when the books ends. These groups could represent the nuclear opponents of the time, mainly the joined States and Russia. "In this book Dr. Seuss turns didactic and calls up many moral arguments adults make against nuclear proliferation." (Lystad 1) This book "ends without resolution of the issues" (Lystad 2) and leaves it up to the reader to decide his or her own beliefs on nuclear war. Political issues arise again in Green Eggs and Ham. In this book "Sam-I-Am &8217s persistence convinces a friend to try out an unusual - but tasty - dish." (Horn 67) This confrontation surrounded by Sam-I-Am and his friend is "so obviously a parable about the struggle between capitalist and collective ideologies." (Atkinson 132) It can be said that Sam-I-Am represents the capitalist United States trying to convince communist countries to try the new, strange and unusual dish of green eggs and ham, which represents capitalism. ... ... the kind-hearted elephant agrees to garter a lazy bird by academic session on her egg while she flies off for a vacation. The mother bird decides to never source back. Horton suffers through many problems such as shitty weather and being ridiculed by the other animals. In the end, Horton is rewarded when the egg hatches into an elephant-bird. All of these works "suggest to the reader that individual can and should be responsible for the eudaemonia of others." (Horn 70)     Wit hin the playful artwork and imaginative language, Dr. Seuss&8217 children&8217s books convey ideas about nuclear proliferation, environmental hazards, economics, fascism, and morality. Despite the fact that some of these works are more than fifty years old, the important messages within them still hold true today. Whether or not the parents who buy the books of Dr. Seuss realize the value set(p) in them, their value as teaching tools for children cannot be disputed. In all, the messages given by Dr. Seuss through his works could be the very essence of this writers popularity. The messages are base and widely applicable, ensuring that his work can be useful to and enjoyed by all. Political, Social And Moral Me Essay -- essays research papers Theodore Seuss Geisel, better known to generations of readers all over the world as "Dr. Seuss," is the American author of many popular children&8217s books. Dr. Seuss&8217 "deft combination of easy words , swift rhymes and batty nonsense" (Horn 69) has convinced many children that reading does not have to be a boring chore, but instead can be fun and entertaining. Amidst these wacky drawings of zany characters spouting off crazy rhetoric, there is much hidden symbolism. Many of Dr. Seuss&8217 works contain political, social, and moral messages.     Political messages in Dr. Seuss&8217 works include war, economic and environmental themes. Two of Dr. Seuss&8217 later works, The Butter Battle Book and The Lorax, "take strong stands on the dangers of indifference to world affairs." (Horn 70) In The Butter Battle Book, Seuss takes nuclear war as his theme. Two groups of animals live on either side of a stone wall. One side eats their bread butter side up, while the other side eats their bread butter side down. Because of each group&8217s odd ways, neither side trusts the other. Each side sets up a border patrol with mild protection. Over the co urse of the book, the weapons get more complicated and powerful until each side invents "the bitsy big-boy boomeroo," a very powerful bomb. Each side is ready to destroy the other when the books ends. These groups could represent the nuclear opponents of the time, mainly the United States and Russia. "In this book Dr. Seuss turns didactic and calls up many moral arguments adults make against nuclear proliferation." (Lystad 1) This book "ends without resolution of the issues" (Lystad 2) and leaves it up to the reader to decide his or her own beliefs on nuclear war. Political issues arise again in Green Eggs and Ham. In this book "Sam-I-Am&8217s persistence convinces a friend to try an unusual - but tasty - dish." (Horn 67) This confrontation between Sam-I-Am and his friend is "so obviously a parable about the struggle between capitalist and socialist ideologies." (Atkinson 132) It can be said that Sam-I-Am represents the capitalist United St ates trying to convince communist countries to try the new, strange and unusual dish of green eggs and ham, which represents capitalism. ... ... the kind-hearted elephant agrees to help a lazy bird by sitting on her egg while she flies off for a vacation. The mother bird decides to never come back. Horton suffers through many problems such as bad weather and being ridiculed by the other animals. In the end, Horton is rewarded when the egg hatches into an elephant-bird. All of these works "suggest to the reader that individual can and should be responsible for the welfare of others." (Horn 70)     Within the playful artwork and imaginative language, Dr. Seuss&8217 children&8217s books convey ideas about nuclear proliferation, environmental hazards, economics, fascism, and morality. Despite the fact that some of these works are more than fifty years old, the important messages within them still hold true today. Whether or not the parents who buy the books of Dr. Seuss realize the value placed in them, their value as teaching tools for children cannot be disputed. In all, the messages given by Dr. Seuss through his works could be the very essence of this writers popularity. The messages are basic and widely applicable, ensuring that his work can be useful to and enjoyed by all.

The Color Red in American Beauty Essay -- essays papers

The Color Red in Ameri skunk Beauty The stunner that addresses itself to the eyes is only the spell of the moment the eye of the body is not always that of the soul. George Sand hit the nail right on the head when he said this in 1872. Appearance versus reality has been a central theme in many American creative works including the film American Beauty. American Beauty is a film that delves into your typical, middle-class suburban American home and slowly uncovers all of the abnormalities that lie within. The family is portrayed as normal but as the films tag line suggests look closer then it is possible to fully understand the implications that takes place in this seemingly happy home. The film is masterfully tell by the famous theater director Sam Mendes and encompasses a great number of cinematic techniques that appear fresh and exciting. Critics corroborate mentioned many of these techniques. However, they failed to notice the sly use of excuse used throughout the film--e specially the color red. Sam Mendes effectively uses the color red as a central motif to accentuate biliousness and theme, to contrast families, and to reveal characters personalities and feelings. In American culture red is a color of various meanings and images. The color red is the essence of life it is the color of blood. It can insinuate energy, vitality, passion, anger, power, excitement, and sacrifice. It is a grounding color. Red can stand for warmth, danger, love, sex, death, rage, lust, and beauty. Red is the color used for the womens clothing, the cars, the doors and also it is the color of Lesters blood splattered across the whiten table at the end of the movie. Red is the central motif of the film. Sam Mendes incorporated many of these meaning of red within the film American Beauty, non only did Sam Mendes implant a motif of red, he also incorporated a motif of the red rose. Roses in American culture are the ultimate symbol of love, life and death. Flowers are a large part of the American culture. They have come to symbolize compassion, caring and love. The beauty of roses are superceded with danger, for they have thorns that can prick. Roses epitomize beauty perhaps that is why they chose the title American Beauty. The title American Beauty is a hodgepodge of symbolism it encompasses a transformation of meanings. For the viewer it can stand for the American beauty rose... ...aroline. Jane and Ricky are important too, they are the more grounded of the characters, they are both presented in neutral colors throughout most of the film. They represent balance and neutrality in the movie. Rickys parents are not so neutral they are dressed in pale, washed out colors to show their lack of vitality. Especially Mrs. Fritts, she plays a minor office in the movie and that is precisely the point Sam Mendes makes. She is seen as a minor role in the family. She is usually wearing a long white nightgown and appears almost as a ghost in the picture , t her family, she barely exists.American Beauty is a fantastic film that encourages viewers to look closer. Sam Mendes directed a film about American Beauty and foolish things that Americans do to keep up with appearances. He is urging us to find beauty in our lives, and to forget about having the perfect garden and home. He effectively uses the color red as a central motif to accentuate mood and theme, to contrast families, and to reveal characters personalities and feelings. Mere colour, unspoiled by meaning, and unallied with definite form, can speak to the soul in a thousand different ways.--Oscar Wilde

The Color Red in American Beauty Essay -- essays papers

The Color red ink in American Beauty The witness that addresses itself to the eyes is only the spell of the moment the eye of the body is non always that of the soul. George Sand hit the nail right on the head when he said this in 1872. Appearance versus reality has been a central bailiwick in many American creative works including the film American Beauty. American Beauty is a film that delves into your typical, middle-class suburban American groundwork and slowly uncovers all of the abnormalities that lie within. The family is portrayed as normal but as the films tag line suggests look closer then it is possible to in full understand the implications that takes place in this seemingly happy home. The film is masterfully directed by the famous theater director surface-to-air missile Mendes and encompasses a great number of cinematic techniques that appear fresh and exciting. Critics have mentioned many of these techniques. However, they failed to nonice the clever use of color used throughout the film--especially the color red. surface-to-air missile Mendes efficaciously uses the color red as a central motif to accentuate wittiness and theme, to contrast families, and to reveal characters personalities and feelings. In American culture red is a color of various meanings and images. The color red is the essence of life it is the color of blood. It can insinuate energy, vitality, passion, anger, power, excitement, and sacrifice. It is a grounding color. Red can stand for warmth, danger, love, sex, death, rage, lust, and beauty. Red is the color used for the womens clothing, the cars, the doors and as well as it is the color of Lesters blood splattered across the white table at the end of the movie. Red is the central motif of the film. Sam Mendes incorporated many of these meaning of red within the film American Beauty, Not only did Sam Mendes implant a motif of red, he also incorporated a motif of the red rose. Roses in American culture are the ultimate symbol of love, life and death. Flowers are a large image of the American culture. They have come to symbolize compassion, caring and love. The beauty of roses are superceded with danger, for they have thorns that can prick. Roses epitomize beauty perhaps that is why they chose the title American Beauty. The title American Beauty is a hodgepodge of symbolism it encompasses a variety of meanings. For the viewer it can stand for the American beauty rose... ...aroline. Jane and Ricky are primary(prenominal) too, they are the more grounded of the characters, they are both presented in neutral colors throughout most of the film. They represent balance and neutrality in the movie. Rickys parents are not so neutral they are dressed in pale, washed out colors to show their lack of vitality. Especially Mrs. Fritts, she plays a minor role in the movie and that is precisely the point Sam Mendes makes. She is seen as a minor role in the family. She is usually wearing a long w hite nightgown and appears almost as a ghost in the picture, t her family, she barely exists.American Beauty is a fantastic film that encourages viewers to look closer. Sam Mendes directed a film about American Beauty and foolish things that Americans do to keep up with appearances. He is urging us to find beauty in our lives, and to forget about having the perfect garden and home. He effectively uses the color red as a central motif to accentuate mood and theme, to contrast families, and to reveal characters personalities and feelings. Mere colour, unspoiled by meaning, and unallied with definite form, can speak to the soul in a thousand different ways.--Oscar Wilde

Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Fight for Integration

Martin Luther King junior once said, I have a dream that one twenty-four hour period little black boys and girls will be holding hands with little white boys and girls, (goodreads). His I Have a Dream speech took place in 1963 during the March on Washington. It was there that he established his reputation as one of the greatest orators in American history. Martin Luther King jr. s American dream was that all men should have god-given rights and have equality. To achieve this American dream, Martin Luther King Jr. faced many obstacles to overcome discrimination. Before Martin Luther King Jr. chieved his American dream, there were many obstacles in the way it was not all fun and games. The first one was the difficulty to convince African Americans because they believed that they should fight stand against discrimination. The police were also another obstacle Martin had to face. During the civil rights movement, the police would use dogs and fire hoses towards the blacks to settle b oycotts that were conducted. However, Martin would never use violence back. Another problem that he faced was prejudice ideas. Many whites had opinions about African Americans that kept opportunities for them very limited.Martin never let any of these obstacles stop him from achieving his dreams of equality. Through all the difficulties Martin Luther King Jr. had to face, his American dream never changed. Martin wanted all men to have god-given rights and equality. He had to prove to his own people, the police, and the rest of America that it was possible to stand up for themselves without being violent. With this belief, Americans realized that the white society was in the wrong when it came to discrimination and violence because African Americans were not harming anybody. This helped Martins dream become a reality.Work cited abduce by Martin Luther King Jr. goodreads. Otis Chandler. 28 Aug. 1963. Thur. 8 Nov. 2012. Haberman, Frederick. Martin Luther King-Biography. Nobleprize. org. Les Prix Nobel. N. d. Web. 6 Nov. 2012. Roland, Allen. Martin Luther King/ The Voice That Cant Be Silenced. Thepeoplesvoice. ord. n. d. 17 Jan. 2011. Web. 6 Nov. 2012. name by Martin Luther King Jr. goodreads. Otis Chandler. 28 Aug. 1963. Thur. 8 Nov. 2012. Carson, Clayborne. Life. Encyclopedia of African-American Culture and History. Ed. Colin A. Palmer. 2nd. Ed. Vol. 3. Detroit Macmillan Reference USA, 2006. 1239-1243. Gale U. S. History In Context. Web. 7 Nov. 2012.

Social Control Theory vs. Conflict Theory

The well-disposed fixing surmisal was written and proposed by Travis Hirschi in 1969. Social Bond scheme, that later developed into Social Control surmise, has historically been an interesting charge of approaching social problems and how we in turn explain them. Before one can apply the Social Bond theory, they must first have a firm understanding of its definition, which can be accurately described by Hirschi (1969) as, Elements of social bonding include attachment to families, commitment to social norms and institutions (school, employment), matter in activities, and the belief that these things are important (p. 6).This theory is rooted and derived from the General Theory of Crime. Hirschis (1969) social bond theory emphasizes the fact that there is an absence of social attachments among juvenile delinquents. Since family, friends, and other members of our social networks affect our lives in many ways, we in turn are direct descendents of their actions. wholeness of the most critical times in our lives is our adolescence. During this critical time we need strong positive social ties to represent society in the best way possible.On the other hand, if the ties we share in our lives are negative and criminal-like habits, it most likely that negative results will occur. The basic difference between the General Theory of Crime and Hirschis (1969) Social Bond Theory is the focus on peers and peer groups of individuals. The four basic elements of social bond theory are attachment, commitment, involvement in conventional versus deviant or criminal activities, and lastly the common value system within an individuals society or subgroup. adhesiveness is described as the level of values and or norms that an individual holds in society. Attachment is especially important when it come to the persons parental figures. This theory suggests that conventional figures, such as parents, when bonded make a huge impact in the deterrent of criminal acts. Attachment to o ther peers tend to be still as supportive as parental ties, just as long as these ties are positive and do not deviate from the social norms of society.ReferencesThe Huffington spotlight (2011) NASDAQ Hackers reportly penetrate computer network multiple times Retrieved on February 4, 2011 at http//www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/05/nasdaq-hackers-reportedly_n_819068.htmlWall Street Journal (2011) Hackers penetrate NASDAQ Computer Retrieved on February 5, 2011 at http//online.wsj.com/ term/SB10001424052748704709304576124502351634690.html http//criminology.wikia.com/wiki/Social_Bond_Theory

Bless Me Ultima Essay

What exit Antonio become when he grows up? A priest? A vaquero? A curandero? A farmer? Antonios future is not clear because, at the end of the novel, he has finally decided to ingest his own path. Instead of listening to the beliefs of his mother or the desires of his father, he go away fulfill Ultimas encouragement to follow his heart. With this in mind, it seems likely that Antonio will in all likelihood become a man of learning according to Ultima, Whether or not this means that Antonio will become a priest as well is uncertain. Considering his questions more or less religion and morality and his anxieties about sin, it seems as if the life of a priest is not for him. However, no matter what he decides to do when he becomes an adult, the most all-important(prenominal) thing is that he has learned to make his own path.I had more time to spend with Ultima, and in her company I found a big(p) deal of solace and peace. (Anaya 223) If Antonio found solace and peace with Ultima because of what she did (being a curandera). So why should he give up his solace and peace once she was deceased? If becomes a curandero he would give himself solace and peace because of what he would do like Ultima. I dropped to my knees bless me, Ultima (Anaya 260) Antonio assumeed to bless him right before she died. Antonio did not ask her to bless him in the name of God but a being a curandera. This seems to make Antonio not believe in God but in the powers of curandera. I bless you in the name of all that is good and strong and beautiful, Antonio. Always have the strength to live.Love life, and if despair enters your heart, look for me in the evenings when the tramp is gentle and the owls sing in the hills. I shall be with you(Anaya 261) Ultimas final blessing to Antonio Her statement also gives Antonio a idea with which to understand her death by offering a sequence of physical objects that he can see as symbols of her life and through which he can continue to feel her pres ence. Antonio will be without Ultima and will have to make his own choices without her guidance from now on, but she makes it clear in this blessing that her spirit will endure with him and that the lessons she has taught him will still serve him well even after she dies.

Consider the development Essay

The word praise is the English translation of the Italian word s adepttto, a little well or song. A sonnet is a poesy consisting of fourteen lines, ten syllables in English and Italian and generally twelve in French. in that respect are three basic sonnet forms, the Petrarchan, which is an eight lined and a six lined (octave and sestet) sonnet with no rhyming couplet the Spenserian, consisting of three quatrains and a couplet finally the Shakespearian, consisting of three quatrains (four lines) and a couplet. There are different styles of sonnets all over the world.For example, France has its own unique structure that their sonneteers keep open in and the analogous with other countries. With all these different countries having different styles of writing that also style there are also different rhyming schemes. Reading sonnets is a enormous way of learning about different cultural aspects of life for example during the seventeenth century the central theme of most sonnets wa s religion. During this time it gave people a great opportunity to learn about umteen different religions. The use of enjamb ment occurs in many sonnets.Enjambment is the running on of the groundsght from one line, couplet, or stanza to the next without a syntactical break The first sonneteer was Italian, his name was Francesco Petrarch. He was famous for a collection of Italian lyrics which include a capacious series of love poems. Petrarch wrote his poems about a lady called Laura, whom he met in a church. Laura became the central theme of his poetry. In total Petrarch wrote three hundred and 60 five sonnets. Petrarchs poems were meant to convey his love and devotion to the love of his life Laura. Sonnets moved to England in the sixteenth century.The seventeenth century saw the theme of sonnets multifariousness from love to religion. Donne is a good example of a sonneteer of religion. For two-hundred years a minute amount of sonnets were pen. This was because they fell out o f fashion. hitherto during the nineteenth century sonneteers began to write about the theme of the natural world. William Wordsworth wrote poems such as Composed upon Westminster Bridge. state of war poetry became popular during the time of 1914-1918. This was because The First World War was happening at the time. War was on everybodys mind.The Poetry was read to the soldiers going off to war to motivate and encourage the soldiers to fight for their families and country. The poem Shall I Compare Thee scripted by William Shakespeare is about an unk right awayn woman that Shakespeare compares to a summers day as summer is a picturesque time of year. The poem is written in the Shakespearian form. In the second line Shakespeare writes Thou art more lovely and more temperate This quotation informs the reader that although she cannot be compared to a summers day as she is more than the beauty of summer.Shakespeare writes Rough winds do shake the darling buds of Mai, this quotation is a bout the winds of summer Shakespeare describes them as a type of rage. The woman could never be akin summer as she is kind and caring. At the conclusion of the poem, (the rhyming couplet) Shakespeare writes So long as men can breathe or eyes can see, So long lives this, and this gives life to thee. This quotation informs the reader that she may die. However she will stay live through the poem. The poem Composed Upon Westminster Bridge written in 1802 by William Wordsworth is about Wordsworth love of natural world and the city of London.The first line of the sonnet reads Earth has not anything to show more fair. In this quotation Wordsworth is sitting on Westminster Bridge looking across the beautiful city of London and is inebriated with the picturesque view and feels the world has nothing to compare to it. William Wordsworth writes All bright and glittering in the smokeless air. This quotation informs the reader of the beautiful sunrise and how it glitters across the city. W ordsworth writes The river glideth at his own sweet will. This quotation means that the Thames has many bends on its path through the city of London and has not got a rightful(a) journey like other rivers. Wordsworth metaphorically states that the river glides freely. This sonnet is very popular and was voted 24th most popular poem in 1998. The manner of the sonnet is uplifting. The poem Death be not proud written by put-on Donne is about Donnes personal interpretation of terminal. John Donne does not fear death he does not see it as a bad aspect in life. Donne writes Death, be not proud, though some have called thee mighty and dreadful, for thou art not so. This quotation informs the reader that some people may find death an awful, petrifying experience however it is not, death is a newly beginning. Donne writes Thourt slave to fate, chance, kings and desperate men, and dost with poison, war and sickness dwell. This quotation informs the reader that in life bad things will ha ppen such as diseases and devastation. The mood of this poem is low key and dark. Donne writes One short sleep past, we wake eternally. This quotation informs the reader that after death our souls go to heaven and we awake eternally.John Donne was born in 1572 and died in 1631 at the age of 59. During Donnes lifetime this would have been considered an old age to die. There was a short life foreboding during this period because of all the disease and drug taking. The poem Peace written by Rupert Brooke is a war poem and it appealed to readers in the First World War as it informs them why their loved ones died in battle. Brooke was a very popular sonneteer as his poems would get the soldiers pumped up and ready for the gruesome activity that is war. Brooke encourage people to be patriotic, to fight for their country and beliefs.Brook writes Leave the sick hearts that honour could move. This quotation conveys the fact that there are masses of casualties in a war just as there were in World War One. The sonnet The Vanity of his Passion written by Petrarch is addressed to his love, Laura. However he feels unreciprocated love. This could be for two reasons. Laura only exists in his mind or she is out of his league and could never fall in love with him. The sonnet is written in the first person this is because Petrarch is expressing his love to Laura (There is a direct address to the lady).Petrarch uses many abstract nouns in his writing he uses two in the title, vanity and passion. The reason for Petrarch using several abstract nouns is that it reflects the abstract nature of his love. Petrarch writes Throughout my song, by hopes and vain griefs bed this quotation means that Petrarch recognises that he was vain ever to believe that she might ever love him. When Petrarch was younger he thought he was in love he now realises what it means to be in passion drowned Petrarch writes That worldly pleasure is a passing dream. This quotation informs that the love is shor t and cant last. His love is like a dream. The mood of the poem is very desolate as Petrarch wants something he is unable to achieve. In conclusion the central sonnet theme has not changed in hundreds of years, many are still written today. As time has progressed different forms have been introduced such as the Spenserian and the Shakespearian. My favourite sonnet is Shall I compare thee because Shakespeare uses many descriptive language associated with summer and his mysterious woman, this shows the depth of his love for her.

Poverty and Crime Essay

Poverty can be defined as the deprivation of basic needs or necessities. These argon things that atomic number 18 required by human beings for them to survive for example shelter, clothing, food and water. Poverty causes pain and stress to those who suffer from it but according to the Christians, it is seen as a positive thing that makes them more faithful and neglect of these properties is deemed virtuous. On the other hand, nuisance is seen as the violation of rules and regulations of the state. When this is done, the culprit is regarded as a criminal. Acts of curse argon punishable by law if one is convicted guilty of committing a particular offense.see moreessays on crimePoverty and crime are interrelated as poverty is an in expectent variable while crime is the dependant variable and manipulation of one has an effect on the other, that is if poverty is reduce the rate of crime would definitely go down. This research paper is geared towards brining to the light the relation ship between poverty and crime. Do they nurse a correlation? There have been claims that poverty tops to crime and this can non be denied as in America today, crime prevalence is registered in zones that are inha confidence trickd by the piteous Americans. It is not a usual thing for a place to have high rate of crime without the cause for it.Poverty is not wholly contain to the abject third world countries as even in America, United Kingdom and other developed nations there are multitude who live in penury. In the United States, the despicable live in housings bonkn as ghettos and the most affected are the African Americans. Many people repel the claim that poverty is the causal pointor of crime. For example in Boston, in the 1830s there were very many cases of crime, which to many was attributed to poverty. This became a challenge to the inhabitants who in a bid to reduce the level of crimes formed charity organizations that were meant for helping these paltry people .Many people thought that the poor people are the ones who commit mistakes so these organizations that were formed were designed to reduce the number of African Americans in the war. (Sampson RJ. 1987) In the United States of America, it is reportedly said that the number of b lacks in prisons is ofttimes higher than those that are in educational institutions. In Boston, it was assumed that because women were the ones who went for charity items, which were given for free by the Bostons charity organizations.Here, this was not the case as in Boston as the number of women who were imprisoned was 12. 25 percent and not forgetting that this figure comprised women of all nationalities. This research contradicted the much-theorized belief that poverty and crime are related. roughly crimes that are associated with poverty do not have a correlation when they are closely scrutinized. These are crimes such as vandalism, arson and wanton demise of properties. Why would a poor person destroy well-nigh properties that could he/she could use? Poor people are forced by poverty to spot to crime.In most assault cases, the victims claim that they lost their properties so it can be confidently be said that the perpetrators are people who cannot afford those commodities and so they think that the only way they could access them is only through assaulting the rich and becoming robbers. According to sociologists, there is a very strong affiliation between, the crime rate and the families open ups in the United States towns and cities. Cities that are occupied by the blacks have reported increase in violent crime rate and this is attributed to the prevalence of the pistillate-headed families. Pager D. 2001)As per the 1980s research, the ratio of whites to blacks that were engaged in violent crimes was not in proportion. According to the 1983 statistics, more murder and assault cases in boodle took place in areas that were inhabited by the African American and the Latino re sidents who were low-income earners. This attests to the fact that there is a relationship between crimes and poverty and this is undeniable, if this is not the case, indeed why is it that areas that are occupied by the poor register so many crimes?The past researches that were done in the 1980s expressed a connection between single parent headed families with crime prevalence and especially in black households. In 1984, all the black families were under female parents and this trend is appease growing as the numbers of families with two parents are constantly on the decline. Of all the 360,000 families that lived on five thousand dollars and below, females headed fifty seven percent of them. The ratio of families that were headed by single women between the blacks and the whites were 74 percent to 26 percent. In Chicago, females own most of the poor households and especially the ghettos.So the increase in female households and most particularly those in the ghettos have a relatio nship between the high rate of dependency and poverty. (Pridemore W. A. and Kim S. W. 2007) A statistical analysis that was done in hundred and fifty cities in America attributes rise in female-headed families to poverty. This is because when men are not employed they move out of these cities and go to look for jobs going behind their wives and this causes family disruptions. In turn, this family break-up leads to the rise in crime rates and especially in blacks residential places.Low income contributes to marriage separations as well as split cases. Children from families that are headed by a female parent are prone to indulge themselves in fresh delinquency. When children are raised in poor households they do not even have the proper education that they deserve and this constructs a vicious circle whereby poverty is caused by lack of relevant skills and education. This makes it firmly to honest oneself a good job that can help one to achieve their needs thereby becoming eve n poorer. Marital and family break ups weaken the affable control mechanisms that are vital in reducing the crimes rate.When these social control means are in force people look at individually other as their brother or sister, they develop a we feeling and they protect each other properties. They also help one another to go down their disputes but when family bonds are weakened, this problem is transferred to the society that is made up of families. The result is that socialism is substituted by individualism or in other words, people become egoistic and everything they do is meant of them and only them. People devise short cuts of acquiring wealth and this means robbery, assault and murder as per the situation demands. George F. Et Al. 2008)When family bonds are strong, twain parents assist each other in taking care of the children and they are well socialized to know the social expectations but when households are headed by only one parent, the attention that should be given t o the children is divided among other things and it is obvious that when a child lacks proper attention, guidance and counseling, they become juvenile criminals. Therefore family disruptions as a result of poverty leads to rise in female headed families, which in turn leads to juvenile delinquency.In the United States of America, there are some states that have very high crime rate and yet the residents are not poor and there are some states where people are very poor and yet the crime rate is very low. This makes the debate over whether poverty has a relationship with crime very controversial. These claims are contradicted by the research findings on other areas findings in other areas where 53 percent of all the inmates are people from poor areas where they earned about less than 10,000 U. S dollars in a year. According to the economic theory, people weigh options before they commit crimes.It is said that people engage themselves in crime only and only if the anticipated gains are more than the loss. (George F. Et Al. 2008) The obvious logical conclusion that can be inferred from this is that people who are poor and those who live in poverty-stricken households are more prone to community crimes than those who are not poor. Those people who are wallowing in poverty are more likely to commit crimes such as larceny, robbery, burglary and selling drugs and inspection delinquency. If this is the case, then poor households and prisons should do something to reverse the situation.This is because if poverty level goes up so does the crime rates and this in turn impacts on the prisons that get super populated with criminals. The government should come up with measures that would help in breaking this relationship because this trend affects the rectifyional departments. There is no way you can correct the behavior of poor people because they are situational criminals. It is only that they are forced by circumstances to commit crimes. The only viable option of cont rolling or reducing the crime prevalence is to economically empower the poor citizens.The fact that poverty and crime are interrelated is evident in the case of Detroit city, which is among the poorest cities in the United States of America. Poor citizens inhabit the surrounding area of this town. The organization is marred by extreme poverty and loss of social control mechanisms. Most of the students who matrimony campuses never graduate because before they could graduate, they get involved in criminal acts that render some of them in jails. Another thing that leads to the rise of criminal activities is the fact that in societies there are two extreme ends, and these are the rich and the poor.In the United States the gap between the haves and have-nots is very high something that intrigues poor people to steal or engage in other forms of criminal activities just to earn their living. If a rich person is living in close law of proximity to the poor households, there is high probab ility that he/she will become a victim of assault, loss of properties and even robbery. This happens because the poor thinks that the rich are the ones who are making them poor and therefore they develop some bitterness that is only resolved by attacking them. (George F.Et Al. 2008) There are various causes of poverty and some of them are high living standards. In most developed notion such as Japan, United States and others, it is not easy to live in cities if you depend on a low paying job. People might be employed but the living standards should be very high. This situation impoverishes the citizens for they find it hard to make the both ends meet. What the government should do is that it should provide those poor American households that belong to the poor with some house allowance so that they can lead a normal life.This would help in reducing the bridge gap the gap between the rich and the poor which unless something is done soon, the gap is still widening. The lack of proper skills and education, limits ones chances of getting a good job Poor people cannot afford to provide for their children with good education that would make them competitive and this is why we should break the vicious cycle of poverty. Many Americans are poor because they cannot secure themselves some good jobs probably because there are no jobs or they do not academically qualify for those jobs. The government should devise ways and means of breaking this cycle.Bursary system or subsidized education for the poor should be provided. This would offer the poor a chance to compete with those from the wealthy households. If this is done the high drop out rate from schools would be reversed as this is what has led to increased juvenile crimes because young children who should be in schools go to loiter in the streets as they cannot even afford to be in school. When these children receive high quality education, they would be able to look for well paying jobs that would help them in uplift ing their living standards thereby breaking the vicious cycle.Poverty is partly caused by lack of employment. Another thing that the government should do is to enforce the laws that deal with crimes. The judicial systems should make some reforms that would help it to ensure that justice is upheld. In the 1980s, the judicial system was very reluctant such that criminals received lesser punishment than they deserved something that greatly contributed to the rise in crime. The criminal laws should be made stronger though that they could bite hard. From the research findings, it is evident now that there is a relationship between the rate of poverty and crime rates.Though there have been arguments that indicate otherwise, much of the evidence that has been collected point to the fact that the relationship between the two does exist. There have been claims that there are some states that are very poor and yet there are no high crime rates and that there are others that are among the high est in crime levels any yet the inhabitants not poor. This evidence cannot be downplayed for in every case there must be some exceptions and assumptions that have to be made. Both claims should be weighed well to know which one is truthful and in this case, the truth is that poverty lures people to become criminals.

Barth vs. Brunner and Natural Theology

The fancy of inhering immortal pertains to the belief that ingrained gifts ar provided from sentimention and installed mainly on homosexual mind. Furthermore, it states that the revelations argon provided on the general prospect of valet de chambres, and non merely on special individuals. In this theory, revelations atomic number 18 said to be break offed non solo from the scriptural basis or even from saviour savior .As for the theorys concern, the scholastic tradition of earthy piety had provided their simple explanation why the parole and Jesus Christ received some sort of special revelation . According to indwelling theologians, the rationale for the provision of much(prenominal)(prenominal) special revelation is nil more than an inexplicable event or beyond valet de chambre discernment . As far as the hi grade of immortal is concern, one of the most highlighted debates comes from Karl Barth and Emil Brunner, geological dating from 1914 .From the fan tasys and theological principles introduced by Barth and Brunner comes the great and prolonged theological debate, forthcoming from the quarters of dialectical faith, particularly from Barths radical rejection of the notions of General Revelation and earthy Religion or inborn Theology, including the shoot of contact and the rest. By far, this origin has been kn admit as the Barth-Brunner conflict . Due to the strong influence and genuinely a great deal detailed sway brought by Barth, the conflict between the two theologians has greatly moved(p) the stand flow of todays worship.This controversy has dominated the theological discussion of to-day, and has affected liter att end upant all problem . In this strike, the primary discussion revolves in covering the issues brought by the debates of Barth and Brunner, and the theological concepts embedded in their proposed principles. From the point of view of the study, the setoff thing to discuss is the concept of rude(a) dei ty in order to determine the rationale for its rejection. Next, the study centers on the conflicting theologian, Karl Barth and Emil Brunner.Lastly, the study provides the analysis of their account to explore the primary stand points from both theological purviews. Discussion The Concept of Natural Theology In general, the Re determineers were less enthusiastic ab come forward natural devotion, in part because they rejected very much of the scholastic tradition, in part because it tended to render special revelation, and particularly Scripture, less necessary, and in part because it given fallen compassionate globes powers of correct reasoning that the Reformers themselves saw as corrupted by sin .According to the handed-d take scholastic movement, the concept of natural morality except provides its signifi piece of tailce by illustrating hu valet de chambre race sin and their never-ending need to survive more like an instinctive theological description however, with dwarfish standing foothold in justifying how these benevolentistic needs pursue . It is not the place here to enter into the historical, psychological and theological reasons for the development of this great controversy. The historical reason is the unforgiving op stead that had to be paraden to Nazi ideology and the wrong and dangerous theology of the Ger universe Christians.Barth rendered here an immeasurable service to sound theology and the cause of the perform as a whole . A form of natural theology that is worth defending takes its cue from core theological interpretations of the character of deity and the world. The concept of natural theology comprises of three theoretical perspectives that are derived mainly on character that correlates with the divinity of graven image. The word natural in the expression natural theology is meant to mark a contrast between disposition and revelation.The concept of Natural theology does not imply natural in the perspective of macr ocosm a non-complex and unsophisticated belief, that rather, the natural theology is the product of a fairly sophisticated state of western theism and would have been foreign to mevery great phantasmal thinkers before the shopping center Ages. The concept of natural theology was realized during the era wherein theologians tried to logically obtain the answers to augur existence while at the distributor point of reflecting their religion.At this point of middle Age, theologians obtain the elements that have been established already beforehand, and those that back provide unaided rationale for those parts that they believed to be unnatural. Hence, they coined and develop the natural theology, which in some way contradicts the existence of natural activities through single-handed or chose ones. As for the theory, it mainly exemplifies that everyone is chosen in their own account of world an image created after paragon . The concept of natural theology allied with Nazism most especially during the clipping of Jews massive discrimination.Significantly, the natural theology, even from the early times, pointed its fingers to chosen individuals, such as the Jews, wherein the theology contradicts the incident that these people are chose. The possibility of natural theology has been denied by some theologians and by some philosophers. The theological purposes against natural theology are mostly concerned with the relationship between reason and doctrine they urge the uselessness of reason as a means to salvation and of philosophic guess as a step on the road to heaven .One of the inbred critical review that served as ground basis for the concept of natural theology is the concomitant that these principles are essentially from the philosophical perspectives, which in the end obtained vast arguments and criticisms against natural theology itself. In particular, the theologians of Natural perspective drew heavily on natural philosophy to show how the han d of the Creator could be discerned in the Book of Nature as well as the Book of Scriptures.By contrast, those still wedded to a more traditional order in Church and State tended to be wary of natural theology and the forms of natural philosophy interlinked with it as obscurities from a theology based on Divine revelation . On the other hand, the significance of Natural theology is its ability to provide an analysis of the clement situation and the query of beau ideal implied in it. One side of the traditional arguments for the existence of god usually does this, in so far as they elucidate the dependent, transitory, and relational character of finite mankind beings existence.But, in developing the other side of these arguments, natural theology tried to derive theological affirmations from the analysis of mans finiteness . The natural theology concentrates mainly on the natural imagery of men as earthly beings being linked to Gods image. As for the theory, it mentions that e very human being possesses the right to obtain revelation from God for everyone is from the same image, which is God. Somehow, these two rationales are deemed as the primary arguments that render the argument of the Natural theology.First, natural theology should not claim to operate with an account of pure, objective, ahistorical reason . For mans reasoning cannot be considered absolutely pure from intention for man by his own nature is deprived from complete purity hence, contradicts the record of natural theology itself. Second, natural theology should not offer a philosophical metaphysics as a way of mediating between faith and the world . From these concepts, the argument against natural theology settles in. Different theologians, most significantly Karl Barth realizes the wrong ideations brought by the theology.From the perspective of Thomas doubting Thomas (12251274), he claimed that there are certain laws that are attainable by the powers of reason properly applied, and o thers that are beyond the reach of reason, and are known only through revelation. From Aquinas theology, the concept attaining revelation and reason conjoins to further discover the truth and absolute reasoning . The concept of nature in the doctrines of theology can be misleading and contradictory for its very meaning can be a pro rear statement of obscurity, which can besides contribute to the shadow of Gods imagery .As for the theory of Natural origination, it is a major concept where philosophy of religion interrelates theological aspects. Philosophies of religion scrutinizes what the unadulterated existence of the foundation entails what it forces us to conclude, and likewise what its order entails. Protestantism is usually against the concept of natural theology for they claim that God, whose existence is demonstrated, is not the Christian God. For Protestants, God Himself should not concern in Himself in providing His existence for He in fact exist above all.Whether natur al theology is to be dismissed and why is a major landing field of investigation in Christian theology. Roman Catholic somehow defended the concept of natural theology for they believe that there are essential differences between what we can know of God by means of natural theology and what we know of God by revelation. Currently, natural theology tends to act and to be used as a tool that metaphorically provides clergy and students some rigorous proof to demonstrate Gods existence .Emil Brunner In 1914, Brunner published a work entitle Nature and Grace wherein his main argument coincides mainly on the generational theologys task of reverting back to the concept of natural theology . Brunner, being one of the main characters of natural theological concept, obtained his idea of natural theology from the concept of imago Del or in translation would mean, sign of God. valet nature is constituted in such a way that there is an analog with the being of God .Considering the sinful nat ure of human beings as installed already in their instinctive characteristic, Brunner stated that the ability of human beings to discern the nominal head of God is still there by the concept or reasoning that God remains in the natural environment. Within the context of human beings as sinners, still their innate nature are capable of recognizing the presence of God and are still aware of their guilt before God. All these linkage are brought by the concept of natural stand present in man from the time of his creation and image pattern.Hence, as Brunner concluded, this linkage brings forth revelation to every man with no special disposition present, such as sinner or holy, rich or poor, or any other means. Brunner significantly pointed out that God can manifest His revelation to anyone with no stipulation on human characteristic since human beings are all created out of his natural image . As per Brunners defense on natural theology, greatly point out the significance of the doctri ne of the incarnation to revelation in Christ may be seen the personal self-disclosure of God .From Brunners ground basis, it is the story of creation that serves as the fore ground of this theological belief. He reasoned that there are considerably three rationales that offer support for the theory of Natural theology namely, human reason, and order of the world and beauty of the world . In the argument of Human Reason, considering that Gods existence can be found in His creation, and whence it is acceptable to use the idea that God can be most likely found in the highest peak of His creation, which is human reason .The next argument Brunner introduced is the ordering of the world, wherein the prime philosopher concerned is Thomas Aquinas. Considering that the natural pattern in the environment is unquestionably and extremely organized, this phenomena been emphasized to be from God . Brunner did no go as far in denouncing the philosophical approach to God. Nevertheless, Brunner st ated that the attempt to derive knowledge of God from creation, which is the theology of natural religion, is in the long run not being helpful in theological doctrine.He even admitted that the knowledge of the Creator forms as a component of our existence. However, Brunner concluded that this knowledge component rigid to human beings as Gods creation does not follow that human beings know God completely, since such philosophical intelligence does not end in chat with God . Brunners theology has been linked very much within an existentialist, dialectical theoretical account and focused mainly on the singularity of existential, personal catch. He even continued with basically anthropological starting signal point.Lastly, the concept of beauty present in the world has also been emphasized as an argumentative statement in Brunners ideologies. According to these theologians, the presence of beauty in surrounding world is the primary depiction of Gods existence through the natures beauty . Another focus entailed by Brunner in his beliefs is in faith of having personal en income tax return between the one who hears the Word, believer, or human being per say, and the God who speaks and draws near in grace, as distinct from an acceptance of abstract propositions of belief.Christianity thus sets forth truth as encounter, Brunners primary consummation and influence thus far had come through his writings of The Mediator and The Divine Imperative and in Brunner Oldham perceived the chances and events for creating an innovative and urgently required dialogue between evangelical theology and the contemporary human sciences vital if the churches were to address seriously the current world context . Enveloped in Brunners appeal to nature is an idea, which can be traced back to Luther, known as the orders of creation. The generation Nineteenth-century German Liberal Protestantism had utilized this perspective as their basis, and further genuine a theology, which per mitted the German culture, including a positive assessment of the state, to become of primary significance theologically . Brunner had used this idea of the point of contact back in 1927, and it is integral to his understanding of human nature. For Brunner, human nature is constituted in such a way that there is a ready made point of contract for divine revelation. Revelation thus addresses itself to a human nature, which already has sonic Idea of what that revelation is active.For example, take the gospel demand to repent of sin, Brunner argues that this makes little sense, unless human beings already have some idea of what sin is. Karl Barth Analysis of the Argument During the twentieth century, Karl Barth (18861968) initiated the so called spiritual argument or attack in the theoretical concept of natural theology. For this reason, the theologian ties between him and another leading neo-orthodox theologian, Emil Brunner (18891966) broke due Barths attack on Brunners theological concepts .Such operation is very much important for Barths perspective in that it shows the importance of natural theologys attempt to further provide an illustration of Christianitys attaining its peak on German civilization hence, the sole purpose of Barth is to negate the ally status of natural theology to the concept of Nazism . Barths criticism is that it goes beyond any rejection of natural theology that is based on claims that it is invalid, unpersuasive, or unnecessary .From Barths argument, he exemplified that God has indeed revealed His identity to human beings hence, it should be natural for humans to be convinced on Gods existence. It is already insignificant to have Gods existence justified in other forms for He already chosen to be revealed in the form of His triune son, which is Jesus Christ . A natural theology that proceeds from a different starting point must inevitably compromise and distract in relation to the primary theological task.Even worse, it may threaten to subvert the consecutive nature of the faith by the introduction of foreign and ethically dangerous materials . Barths last consideration to reject the principles of natural education lies with the fact that such form of theology is a potential ally to compensate the needs of German ideations against Jews and other racial backgrounds. By far, the theoretical principle of Natural theology hinders the acknowledgement of Jesus Christ. From the perspective of Barths argument, natural theology is a human attempt to initiation subversions for humans sine qua non for revelation.The theology, by its very purpose and significance, attempts to arrest more about God in a manner and under conditions specified by humans ways and not by God Himself . In Barths view, the concept of natural theology is very much compromised in historical, philosophical and theological significances. The great Scottish theologian Hugh Ross macintosh once summarized the questions stress on revelation as follo ws religious knowledge of God, wherever existing, comes by revelation otherwise we should be committed to the incredible position that a man can know God without Has willing to be known . The main idea embedded in Barths desire to counter the theology of natural perspective is for the purpose of safeguarding the integrity present in divine revelation against human attempts to Construct their own notions of God. As for Barths perspective, he argues that revelations from God do not simply occur to anyone, unless God chose to. It is neither inborn nor chosen to be possessed by me, but it is Gods choice to reveal Himself to an individual. Revelation, indeed, is out of humans power but solely rely to Gods preference.Although deeply distrustful of all justificative instincts, Barth appears to make a minor but important concession in his discussion of natural theology. In its proclamation of Gods self-revelation, the Bible does not ignore the lucubrate of the cosmos or the physical worl d as these are known from empirical observation and human experience. In their own way, they present the divine truth . However, this event does not simply occur or free for man to manipulate. It is not a separate line of enquiry that can simply substitute or displace human perspectives from the original faith .On the contrary, its function in Scripture is to incorporate within a single framework all that attaches to human existence in the cosmos. The argument of Barth provides an extended and systematic criticism of natural theology. The main conflict thrown by his argument argues that such theology, which comes to existence from nature, expresses the humanitys self-preservation and self-affirmation in the face of God . Barth views the concept of natural theology as a safeguarding perspective to cover human beings longing to justify self against God and for the provision of independent intellectualities.His conflicting idealism against this theology rests on his fundamental beli ef that it undermines the necessity and uniqueness of Gods self-revelation. From the logical statement introduced by Barths argument, if knowledge of God can be achieved independently of Gods self-revelation in Christ, then it follows that humanity can dictate the place, time and means of its knowledge of God . The perspective of Barth against natural theology institutes a close relationship between the theology itself and the give in of human independence against religion and divine supervision.Considering Barths familiarity in the concept of natural theology, he confirms and expresses the human desire to find God on our own terms . The central concept on Barths argument had been scrutinized by the religious community hence, considering his argument against natural theology. However, other theologians have been having this boldness of Barths initiating a scientific theology despite of his overcorrection of the Reformed theological position, and that an informed recovery of an old er position is overdue.A scientific theology offers such reappropriation and the stake of these merits pane of glass attention . It is a simple fact of historical theology chat the Reformed theological tradition has not, on the whole, opposed natural theology. endpoint The argument of Barth and Brunner with the subject of natural theology has been present from and long influenced the condition of catholic beliefs and perception against the occurrence of Gods existence and the value of human excuse and intellectual identity.The natural theology mainly states that the existence of God is in the physical form of nature itself, considering its organization, beauty and mans intelligence, which are derived from Gods imagery. However, Barth refuted this theology and stated that Gods existence is in the form of Jesus Christ. He contradicts the theology due to its self-justification, and tendency to form ally with Nazism. Bibliography Allen, D. and Springstein, E. O. Philosophy for Under standing Theology (Westminster canful Knox Press, 2007) p. 19 Clements, K.Faith on the Frontier A Life of J. H. Oldham (Continuum International Publishing Group, 1999) p. 272 Gonzales, J. L. Essential Theological footing (Westminster John Knox Press, 2005) p. 118 Grenz, J. Theology for the Community of God (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2000) p. 50 Huyssteen, W. V. and Shults, F. L. The Evolution of Rationality (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2006) p. 392 Kenny, P. and Kenny, A. . The God of the Philosophers (Oxford University Press, 1979) p. 2 Kraemer H, Religion and the Christian Faith (James Clarke & Co., 2003) p. 356 McGrath, A. E. An institution to Christianity (Blackwell Publishing, 1997) p. 162 McGrath, A. E. Christian Theology An Introduction (Blackwell Publishing, 2006) 170 McGrath, A. E. The perception of God An Introduction to Scientific Theology (Eerdmans Publishing, 2004) p. 84 Porter, et. al. R. The Cambridge History of Science (Cambridge University Press, 2003) p. 270 Scott, P. A Political Theology of Nature (Cambridge University Press, 2003) p. 40 Tilich, P. domineering Theology (University of Chicago Press, 1963) p. 14Barth vs. Brunner and Natural TheologyIntroductionThe concept of natural theology pertains to the belief that natural gifts are provided from conception and installed mainly on human mind. Furthermore, it states that the revelations are provided on the general prospect of humans, and not merely on special individuals. In this theory, revelations are said to be revealed not only from the Scriptural basis or even from Jesus Christ .As for the theorys concern, the scholastic tradition of natural theology had provided their simple explanation why the Scripture and Jesus Christ received some sort of special revelation . According to natural theologians, the rationale for the provision of such special revelation is nothing more than an unexplainable event or beyond human reason . As far as the history of theology is concerned, one of t he most highlighted debates comes from Karl Barth and Emil Brunner, dating from 1914 .From the concepts and theological principles introduced by Barth and Brunner comes the great and prolonged theological debate, forthcoming from the quarters of dialectical theology, particularly from Barths radical rejection of the notions of General Revelation and Natural Religion or Natural Theology, including the point of contact and the rest. By far, this argument has been known as the Barth-Brunner conflict . Due to the strong influence and very much detailed argument brought by Barth, the conflict between the two theologians has greatly affected the stand point of todays theology.This controversy has dominated the theological discussion of to-day, and has affected literally every problem . In this study, the primary discussion revolves in covering the issues brought by the debates of Barth and Brunner, and the theological concepts embedded in their proposed principles. From the point of view of the study, the first thing to discuss is the concept of natural theology in order to determine the rationale for its rejection. Next, the study centers on the conflicting theologian, Karl Barth and Emil Brunner.Lastly, the study provides the analysis of their argument to explore the primary stand points from both theological perspectives. Discussion The Concept of Natural Theology In general, the Reformers were less enthusiastic about natural theology, in part because they rejected much of the scholastic tradition, in part because it tended to render special revelation, and particularly Scripture, less necessary, and in part because it granted fallen human beings powers of correct reasoning that the Reformers themselves saw as corrupted by sin .According to the traditional scholastic movement, the concept of natural theology only provides its significance by illustrating human sin and their never-ending need to survive more like an instinctive theological description however, w ith little standing ground in justifying how these humanistic needs pursue . It is not the place here to enter into the historical, psychological and theological reasons for the development of this great controversy. The historical reason is the adamant opposition that had to be shown to Nazi ideology and the wrong and dangerous theology of the German Christians.Barth rendered here an immeasurable service to sound theology and the cause of the Church as a whole . A form of natural theology that is worth defending takes its cue from core theological interpretations of the nature of God and the world. The concept of natural theology comprises of three theoretical perspectives that are derived mainly on nature that correlates with the divinity of God. The word natural in the expression natural theology is meant to mark a contrast between nature and revelation.The concept of Natural theology does not imply natural in the perspective of being a non-complex and unsophisticated belief, but rather, the natural theology is the product of a fairly sophisticated state of western theism and would have been foreign to many great religious thinkers before the Middle Ages. The concept of natural theology was realized during the era wherein theologians tried to logically obtain the answers to divine existence while at the stage of reflecting their religion.At this point of Middle Age, theologians obtain the elements that have been established already beforehand, and those that can provide unaided rationale for those parts that they believed to be unnatural. Hence, they coined and develop the natural theology, which somehow contradicts the existence of natural activities through single-handed or chose ones. As for the theory, it mainly exemplifies that everyone is chosen in their own account of being an image created after God . The concept of natural theology allied with Nazism most especially during the time of Jews massive discrimination.Significantly, the natural theology, even from the early times, pointed its fingers to chosen individuals, such as the Jews, wherein the theology contradicts the fact that these people are chose. The possibility of natural theology has been denied by some theologians and by some philosophers. The theological arguments against natural theology are mostly concerned with the relationship between reason and faith they urge the uselessness of reason as a means to salvation and of philosophical speculation as a step on the road to heaven .One of the essential criticism that served as ground basis for the concept of natural theology is the fact that these principles are essentially from the philosophical perspectives, which in the end obtained vast arguments and criticisms against natural theology itself. In particular, the theologians of Natural perspective drew heavily on natural philosophy to show how the hand of the Creator could be discerned in the Book of Nature as well as the Book of Scriptures.By contrast, those stil l wedded to a more traditional order in Church and State tended to be wary of natural theology and the forms of natural philosophy interlinked with it as obscurities from a theology based on Divine revelation . On the other hand, the significance of Natural theology is its ability to provide an analysis of the human situation and the question of God implied in it. One side of the traditional arguments for the existence of God usually does this, in so far as they elucidate the dependent, transitory, and relational nature of finite human existence.But, in developing the other side of these arguments, natural theology tried to derive theological affirmations from the analysis of mans finitude . The natural theology concentrates mainly on the natural imagery of men as earthly beings being linked to Gods image. As for the theory, it mentions that every human being possesses the right to obtain revelation from God for everyone is from the same image, which is God. Somehow, these two ratio nales are deemed as the primary arguments that render the argument of the Natural theology.First, natural theology should not claim to operate with an account of pure, objective, ahistorical reason . For mans reasoning cannot be considered absolutely pure from intention for man by his own nature is deprived from complete purity hence, contradicts the statement of natural theology itself. Second, natural theology should not offer a philosophical metaphysics as a way of mediating between faith and the world . From these concepts, the argument against natural theology settles in. Different theologians, most significantly Karl Barth realizes the wrong ideations brought by the theology.From the perspective of Thomas Aquinas (12251274), he claimed that there are certain truths that are attainable by the powers of reason properly applied, and others that are beyond the reach of reason, and are known only through revelation. From Aquinas theology, the concept attaining revelation and reason conjoins to further discover the truth and absolute reasoning . The concept of nature in the doctrines of theology can be misleading and contradictory for its very meaning can be a profound statement of obscurity, which can also contribute to the eclipse of Gods imagery .As for the theory of Natural origination, it is a major concept where philosophy of religion interrelates theological aspects. Philosophies of religion scrutinizes what the sheer existence of the universe entails what it forces us to conclude, and likewise what its order entails. Protestantism is usually against the concept of natural theology for they claim that God, whose existence is demonstrated, is not the Christian God. For Protestants, God Himself should not concern in Himself in providing His existence for He in fact exist above all.Whether natural theology is to be dismissed and why is a major area of investigation in Christian theology. Roman Catholic somehow defended the concept of natural theology for t hey believe that there are essential differences between what we can know of God by means of natural theology and what we know of God by revelation. Currently, natural theology tends to act and to be used as a tool that metaphorically provides clergy and students some rigorous proof to demonstrate Gods existence .Emil Brunner In 1914, Brunner published a work entitled Nature and Grace wherein his main argument coincides mainly on the generational theologys task of reverting back to the concept of natural theology . Brunner, being one of the main characters of natural theological concept, obtained his idea of natural theology from the concept of imago Del or in translation would mean, Image of God. Human nature is constituted in such a way that there is an analog with the being of God .Considering the sinful nature of human beings as installed already in their instinctive characteristic, Brunner stated that the ability of human beings to discern the presence of God is still there by the concept or reasoning that God remains in the natural environment. Within the context of human beings as sinners, still their innate nature are capable of recognizing the presence of God and are still aware of their guilt before God. All these linkage are brought by the concept of natural stand present in man from the time of his creation and image pattern.Hence, as Brunner concluded, this linkage brings forth revelation to every man with no special disposition present, such as sinner or holy, rich or poor, or any other means. Brunner significantly pointed out that God can manifest His revelation to anyone with no consideration on human characteristic since human beings are all created out of his natural image . As per Brunners defense on natural theology, greatly point out the significance of the doctrine of the incarnation to revelation in Christ may be seen the personal self-disclosure of God .From Brunners ground basis, it is the story of creation that serves as the fore grou nd of this theological belief. He reasoned that there are considerably three rationales that offer support for the theory of Natural theology namely, human reason, and order of the world and beauty of the world . In the argument of Human Reason, considering that Gods existence can be found in His creation, and then it is acceptable to use the idea that God can be most likely found in the highest peak of His creation, which is human reason .The next argument Brunner introduced is the ordering of the world, wherein the prime philosopher concerned is Thomas Aquinas. Considering that the natural pattern in the environment is unquestionably and extremely organized, this phenomena been emphasized to be from God . Brunner did no go as far in denouncing the philosophical approach to God. Nevertheless, Brunner stated that the attempt to derive knowledge of God from creation, which is the theology of natural religion, is ultimately not being helpful in theological doctrine.He even admitted th at the knowledge of the Creator forms as a component of our existence. However, Brunner concluded that this knowledge component placed to human beings as Gods creation does not follow that human beings know God completely, since such philosophical intelligence does not end in communion with God . Brunners theology has been linked very much within an existentialist, dialectical framework and focused mainly on the uniqueness of existential, personal understanding. He even continued with basically anthropological starting point.Lastly, the concept of beauty present in the world has also been emphasized as an argumentative statement in Brunners ideologies. According to these theologians, the presence of beauty in surrounding world is the primary depiction of Gods existence through the natures beauty . Another focus entailed by Brunner in his beliefs is in faith of having personal encounter between the one who hears the Word, believer, or human being per say, and the God who speaks and d raws near in grace, as distinct from an acceptance of abstract propositions of belief.Christianity thus sets forth truth as encounter, Brunners primary effect and influence thus far had come through his writings of The Mediator and The Divine Imperative and in Brunner Oldham perceived the chances and events for creating an innovative and urgently required dialogue between evangelical theology and the contemporary human sciences vital if the churches were to address seriously the current world context . Enveloped in Brunners appeal to nature is an idea, which can be traced back to Luther, known as the orders of creation. The generation Nineteenth-century German Liberal Protestantism had utilized this perspective as their basis, and further developed a theology, which permitted the German culture, including a positive assessment of the state, to become of primary significance theologically . Brunner had used this idea of the point of contact back in 1927, and it is integral to his un derstanding of human nature. For Brunner, human nature is constituted in such a way that there is a ready made point of contract for divine revelation. Revelation thus addresses itself to a human nature, which already has sonic Idea of what that revelation is about.For example, take the gospel demand to repent of sin, Brunner argues that this makes little sense, unless human beings already have some idea of what sin is. Karl Barth Analysis of the Argument During the twentieth century, Karl Barth (18861968) initiated the so called spiritual argument or attack in the theoretical concept of natural theology. For this reason, the theologian ties between him and another leading neo-orthodox theologian, Emil Brunner (18891966) broke due Barths attack on Brunners theological concepts .Such action is very much important for Barths perspective in that it shows the importance of natural theologys attempt to further provide an illustration of Christianitys attaining its peak on German civiliza tion hence, the sole purpose of Barth is to negate the ally status of natural theology to the concept of Nazism . Barths criticism is that it goes beyond any rejection of natural theology that is based on claims that it is invalid, unpersuasive, or unnecessary .From Barths argument, he exemplified that God has indeed revealed His identity to human beings hence, it should be natural for humans to be convinced on Gods existence. It is already insignificant to have Gods existence justified in other forms for He already chosen to be revealed in the form of His triune son, which is Jesus Christ . A natural theology that proceeds from a different starting point must inevitably compromise and distract in relation to the primary theological task.Even worse, it may threaten to subvert the true nature of the faith by the introduction of foreign and ethically dangerous materials . Barths last consideration to reject the principles of natural education lies with the fact that such form of theol ogy is a potential ally to compensate the needs of German ideations against Jews and other racial backgrounds. By far, the theoretical principle of Natural theology hinders the acknowledgement of Jesus Christ. From the perspective of Barths argument, natural theology is a human attempt to initiation subversions for humans necessity for revelation.The theology, by its very purpose and significance, attempts to learn more about God in a manner and under conditions specified by humans ways and not by God Himself . In Barths view, the concept of natural theology is very much compromised in historical, philosophical and theological significances. The great Scottish theologian Hugh Ross Mackintosh once summarized the questions centering on revelation as follows religious knowledge of God, wherever existing, comes by revelation otherwise we should be committed to the incredible position that a man can know God without Has willing to be known .The main idea embedded in Barths desire to cou nter the theology of natural perspective is for the purpose of safeguarding the integrity present in divine revelation against human attempts to Construct their own notions of God. As for Barths perspective, he argues that revelations from God do not simply occur to anyone, unless God chose to. It is neither inborn nor chosen to be possessed by me, but it is Gods choice to reveal Himself to an individual. Revelation, indeed, is out of humans power but solely rely to Gods preference.Although deeply distrustful of all apologetic instincts, Barth appears to make a minor but important concession in his discussion of natural theology. In its proclamation of Gods self-revelation, the Bible does not ignore the details of the cosmos or the physical world as these are known from empirical observation and human experience. In their own way, they attest the divine truth . However, this event does not simply occur or free for man to manipulate. It is not a separate line of enquiry that can simp ly alter or displace human perspectives from the original faith .On the contrary, its function in Scripture is to incorporate within a single framework all that attaches to human existence in the cosmos. The argument of Barth provides an extended and systematic criticism of natural theology. The main conflict thrown by his argument argues that such theology, which comes to humanity from nature, expresses the humanitys self-preservation and self-affirmation in the face of God . Barth views the concept of natural theology as a safeguarding perspective to cover human beings longing to justify self against God and for the provision of independent intellectualities.His conflicting idealism against this theology rests on his fundamental belief that it undermines the necessity and uniqueness of Gods self-revelation. From the logical statement introduced by Barths argument, if knowledge of God can be achieved independently of Gods self-revelation in Christ, then it follows that humanity can dictate the place, time and means of its knowledge of God. The perspective of Barth against natural theology institutes a close relationship between the theology itself and the subject of human independence against religion and divine supervision.Considering Barths familiarity in the concept of natural theology, he confirms and expresses the human desire to find God on our own terms . The central concept on Barths argument had been scrutinized by the religious community hence, considering his argument against natural theology. However, other theologians have been having this assumption of Barths initiating a scientific theology despite of his overcorrection of the Reformed theological position, and that an informed recovery of an older position is overdue.A scientific theology offers such reappropriation and the second of these merits dose attention . It is a simple fact of historical theology chat the Reformed theological tradition has not, on the whole, opposed natural theology. Conclusion The argument of Barth and Brunner with the subject of natural theology has been present from and long influenced the condition of catholic beliefs and perception against the occurrence of Gods existence and the value of human self-justification and intellectual identity.The natural theology mainly states that the existence of God is in the physical form of nature itself, considering its organization, beauty and mans intelligence, which are derived from Gods imagery. However, Barth refuted this theology and stated that Gods existence is in the form of Jesus Christ. He contradicts the theology due to its self-justification, and tendency to form ally with Nazism.BibliographyAllen, D. and Springstein, E. O. Philosophy for Understanding Theology (Westminster John Knox Press, 2007) p. 19.Clements, K. Faith on the Frontier A Life of J. H. Oldham (Continuum International Publishing Group, 1999) p. 272.Gonzales, J. L. Essential Theological Terms (Westminster John Knox Press, 2005) p. 118.Grenz, J. Theology for the Community of God (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2000) p. 50.Huyssteen, W. V. and Shults, F. L. The Evolution of Rationality (Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2006) p. 392.Kenny, P. and Kenny, A. . The God of the Philosophers (Oxford University Press, 1979) p. 2.Kraemer H, Religion and the Christian Faith (James Clarke & Co., 2003) p. 356.McGrath, A. E. An Introduction to Christianity (Blackwell Publishing, 1997) p. 162.McGrath, A. E. Christian Theology An Introduction (Blackwell Publishing, 2006) 170.McGrath, A. E. The Science of God An Introduction to Scientific Theology (Eerdmans Publishing, 2004) p. 84.Porter, et. al. R. The Cambridge History of Science (Cambridge University Press, 2003) p. 270.Scott, P. A Political Theology of Nature (Cambridge University Press, 2003) p. 40.Tilich, P. Systematic Theology (University of Chicago Press, 1963) p. 14.

“Popular Mechanics” by Raymond Carver Essay

Essay discussing the role played by the setting in Popular Mechanics. Analyze the central characters relationship to their surroundings. Does the setting limit the characters options or bring the development of the plot? Does the setting play any significant role in enhancing the theme of the tale?Popular Mechanics was written in order to make the audience imagine their own point in times. The descriptions in this tommyrot be real basic and plain, the universe and woman in the yarn are unnamed with no clue of physical description, and there is no mention of what city, state or country the fabrication takes place. This allows the lector to picture the surroundings and details of the story in their own way, whitethornbe the reader has compreh finis of or been in similar situations and they can put their own faces and locations into the story. The setting is given in very small-scale detail, but it is also the virtually detail of any element in the story. The setting is a very important part of the story and is used to symbolize, foreshadow and relate with the events and characters.The setting described in the first paragraph prepares the reader for a dark, uncomfortable story. Early that day the weather turned and the hundred was melting into dirty water. (Paragraph 1) All of these elements in the setting outside the house are used as symbols for something inside the house. This shows that something good or pure, snow or relationship, is turning into something ugly, dirty water or separation, and it is accident fast, early that day.The first paragraph continues, Streaks of it ran down from the petty(a) shoulder-high window that faced the backyard. (Paragraph 1) This paragraph gives very little detail of the house, but enough to get a mental picture. In this line, it refers to the dirty water which is a symbol for the break down of the relationship of the man and woman. The house is small, shown bythe description of a little shoulder-high window. The story later gives another description that the house is small in paragraph eleven, She stood in the introduction of the little kitchen, holding the baby. The little kitchen is most likely inside a little house. Even though the reader is never specifically told that the house is little, the audience gets small details that spark something in the reader to imagine a small house. The little house can tie in with the characters fight. The house may be too small for the woman to be comfortable raising a peasant there, or it may be too small for the mans pride, both these situations can lead to arguments. The most obvious tie in with the characters and the small house is the fact that it is too small for the both of them, the man is leaving and the woman is glad he is. A bigger house means more(prenominal) success, more pride, and more happiness. All of these elements can possibly lead to a happier relationship.The fact that the window faces the backyard gives the events that go on inside the house a sense of privacy. The neighbors can see what is going on in the attend yard the backyard is used for privacy, when you do not really want everyone to know what you are doing. This description symbolizes the seriously relationship that develops and runs through the small house when the doors are closed.The next line foreshadows the events that happen in the house. Cars slushed by on the street outside, where it was getting dark. But it was getting dark on the inside too. Here the story is pointing out that what is going on outside is going on inside too, and the reader should make the coefficient of correlation at this point. The characters relate to the setting here because they are getting dark on the inside as well the heart, mind and soul of the characters are growing dark feelings. The fact that it is getting dark on the inside too shows that things such as daylight, happiness, love and a relationship are coming to an end and things such as darkness, anger , sadness, and hatred are beginning. The setting is also used symbolically in the story when the flower pot is broken, In the scuffle they knocked down a flowerpot. (Paragraph 26) The flowerpot is used to symbolize the breach up of the man and woman, and the breaking of the baby. Although the reader is not told if the baby was physically broken, the emotional and mental misuse that a child goes through when their parents separate can be seen as a possibility for the child in the story.The setting sets the tone for the story, symbolizes elements inside the house, relates with the characters and foreshadows the events of the story. All of these elements are very important to the story and they are all given in three short paragraphs (Paragraphs 1, 11, 26). The setting is given the greatest amount of detail while the rest of the story is given almost no detail, only stereotypical behavior. The reader is necessary to imagine their own timeline, faces, and many other details, but the s etting is told to show the overall mood the source wanted the reader to see. This proves that the setting is a very powerful element to show that the relationship amid the man and the woman and everything that surrounds them is going from good to bad and eventually, everything is broken.