Comparing And Contrasting A News Issue (terry Shivo?)

Your NameProfessor NameUnit Name27 Feb 2006Your Title Goes HereThe Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy began after editorial cartoons depicting the Muslim prophet Muhammad were published in the Danish countersign Jyllands-Posten on September 30 , 2005 . Danish Islamic organizations staged protests in response . As the controversy has grown some or all of the cartoons have been reprinted in word of honors in more than fifty dollar bill dollar bill other countries , leading to violent protests involving hundreds of deaths , oddly in Muslim countriesI feel this is a suitable bal atomic number 53y to explore and break up media preconceived notion and prejudiced account , as this is a super controversial issue amidst a Muslim universe sensitive over what they grasp as a human beingwide assault by the occidental gentlemans gentleman on their faith and faith , and both liberals and responsibility wingers alike who feel that freedom of speech is sacred and unassailableAs such , I have include news coverage from 3 distinct sources - Al-Jazeera , commonly regarded as the media champion of the Arab world BBC , one of the oldest and respected media institutions in the world and finally , a random daily news from the get together States , to compare the news coverage regarding this controversial issue , and to name any media bias , negative reporting or aid reportingAl- JazeeraThe link to the allegory can be found in the Works Cited partitioning of this . We would expect from a preliminary butt that Al-Jazeera would typically adjoin up the offensive disposition of the cartoons , bring out the sensed insensitivities and double standards of the westward media vis-a-vis the cartoons and the Holocaust , as easy as champion the rights of the Muslim worldSurprisingly , this is not the issue . The news article quoted seemed to ! be circumstanceual rather than domineering in temperament , quoting a variety of sources and viewpoints from both sides of the compete , from the Danish media and politicians to Hamas and other Islamic militant groups .

No underlying or latent propaganda was detected indeed , negative quotes were enwrap in double quotes , and attributed to its source . The language apply was non-inflammatory , pore on facts and events , and there was no strong hint of an perspicacity pieceThe close set(predicate) the Al-Jazeera piece came to being biased was when it was reporting on the nature of the cartoons (drawings ) at the heart of the controversy . The s used were blameless , non-misleading , and mildly strong . However , there was no maintain of the Western world point of view , or of the fact that the combined cartoons at the heart of the controversy which were pervade by Danish imams contained 3 additional (highly offensive ) drawings not published by the Jyllands-PostenI conclude that the Al-Jazeera piece , when factual in nature and non-inflammatory , seems more interested in presenting the reaction of the Muslim world as well as the threats made by them , when ignoring the Western point of view . There seemed to be an fantastic tension on the negative incidents such as attacks and boycotts that has occurred as a result of the backlash against the cartoonsBBC...If you want to get a in full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper