'Negative impact of modern technology on students\r'

'IntroductionThe picture shift in the contemporary beau monde in relation to the attainment surroundings witnessed in the r pop out out of a new light of advancement in engineering has had all sorts of stupor on miscellaneous entities in the society. The forces of globalization have been viewed directly as destructive in many a(prenominal) ways though this is noneffervescent debatable as it is subjective of individualized judgment. When engine room fails to be economic consumptiond constructively or when it does not find an effective application, technology shapes pestilential to autonomy in thought exercise and action.This technology has securen installation of the gadgets of science into the classrooms, study rooms and to be specific, to the schoolchilds’ life. It has immobilise the cap efficacy of self creativity in students as they leave all opinion to machines like randomness processing system and the hi-tech tuition gadgets. almost people entr eat that new(a) technology has a damaging concern on the amicableization of students because it eliminates need for material activity, impairs overcritical thinking skills, and limits brass to face fundamental moveion.DiscussionLimits face to face actionThis is not a subject one would dis bat at once by leaning on one particular side. It is because imperative to critically look at both sides of the divide and an learn views on the basis of zero bias. On the contrary, and in support of the argument above, we find that technology has invaded the nurture milieu and turned it upside down. The introduction of calculators in schools, for example, has reduced the level of student- to-student interaction and in its blank space placed student-to-computer interaction to rule supreme. (Glenn M. Kleiman (2000) The Digital Classroom- http://hepg.org/hel-home/home).This promoter that the students spend most of their time relating and communicating with the machines kinda than f ace-to-face interaction of the students to each other. This later on leads to bumpment of ethical dilemmas in the future society. In such a milieu the learner prefers to think with ‘non-physical’ characters on TV, net or web. This leads to stereotyping behavior in students. Recent research carried out in 2001, (Seemann, E. et al-(2001).Also see C. Crawford et al. 2001 , reveals that the use of computer mediated communication and technology in the learning surround has considerable impaction in changing the lives of students in the classroom. It further indicates that by dint of modern technology, students’ behavior in terms of interactions with the teachers and the tutors is vastly influenced as well as that among the students themselves. This approach, the researchers argue, downplays the significance of affectionate contact hence may lead many students to fail in developing the necessary social skills to function in the world..Impediment to Critical th inkingSecondly, the use of the modern technology in learning environment may be a substantial threat to the ability of students to develop heights level of critical thinking. This manner that since the use of computer assist communication allow for entail the fingers pressing for a click of the mouse, ignition of ideas give be thwarted and and so hinder creativity. When there is no liberation of ideas there’s little or no creativity and therefore originality and subsequent development take a bum seat. Because of availability of a machine with ready-to-use programs, the student ordain not c atomic number 18 questioning of the present regularity of approach to a problem and therefore allow not discover new ways and nitty-gritty of solving a given problem.Eliminates need for physical activityThe technology can also play sooner a significant role in producing laziness in terms of reduced physical tact to engage in any case that involves exercise to the body. The im portance physical exercises play to the body is of salient relevancy to the healthy development of a physically fit individual. The above research also reiterates that dismantle physical activity by students becomes a incubus as the only involvement of the student will be the hand or fingers, the eyes together with ears- if there be any additional percentage point on the list, it should be nothing other than level best fixation to the screen, (Seaman, E. et al-(2001)).Opposing argumentsOn the other side of the divide lies the great relevance computer aided communication and technology based learning have in modeling individual students in the classroom and the society. Those who argue that the relevance of technology in a learning environment is absolute contend that though the technology may have some negative impacts, the positive achievements are far much superb and outweigh the negative ones.  This argument holds that a student needs to develop the skills referred to a s the multiple news shows (Howard Gardner, 1983).Gardner says that the use of the powerful expert enables speeded development of these intelligences. In addition, human machine interaction enables an individual to think, communicate and deliberate on ideas by means of development of creativity in words, speech and writing. Most modern technology like some computer software that allows young children to and illustrate their own narratives or stories before their motor skills are fully essential enhance learning and creativity to start advance(prenominal) in life.Even though the use of computer aided communication and the technology in the conveyance of learning information is objected by some, learners are able to interact closely with mathematical intelligences which enable them to memorize, and carry out mathematical operations in addition to thinking mathematically, analytically and logically before applying the understanding to solve problem. Through these modern systems stu dents are able to interact with scientists exploring the depths of certain places but electronically.The students also develop high ability to understand the world they live in by means of what they see thus developing spacial or visual intelligence. By development of kinesthetic intelligence students are able to learn through dexterity and coordination thus developing the ability to let loose their feelings better thereby removing any doubts of ethical dilemmas. The students in like manner can have musical intelligence thus be able to perform and appreciate or create music by whichever means, voice, dance or instruments. Though some scholars argue and affirm that use of the technology reduces the student’s socialization capability, others maintain that in the real sense the technology gives the student the chance to gain high levels of interpersonal intelligence thus being able to cooperatively control with others. This is done through electronic networking.Refutation The bias that is revealed when laborious to analyze the argument from one viewpoint is quite evident. Technology has been of great importance in up(a) the quality of education, the efficiency in acquisition of information and effective application of positive changes in the society and realization of the relevance of these changes to the learning environment.At the same time, it would still be unwise to refute the negative impacts of the technology to the social relations, physical activity and critical thinking of the students in their classrooms. However, the positive role played in enhancing the appreciation of technology in the learning environment cannot go without being lauded. The role for sure supersedes by far the demerits that accompany it.ConclusionTo be of maximum realize and relevance, application of technology in the learning environment must be applied with care and precondition in order to make the learning process to be qualitatively different and attractive. As we bosom the benefits of having technology, we must also prepare to deal with its negativities. This way, the learning process in the classroom can become richer and pose less threat to the values and autonomy of every individual student. Otherwise it would have an impact that is not desirable whether the learning environment is home-based or institutional one.References:Seemann, E., Wilkinson, L., et al. Impact of Technology on assimilation of Student in the Classroom, 2001.Kleiman, Glenn M. The Digital Classroom- 2000. Accessed on Friday April 25, 2008 from universal resource locator: http://hepg.org/hel-home/homeCrawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Teacher Education and instruction Technology. International Conference; 2001 pp. 104-108.\r\n'